motherjones: ilovecharts: Super misleading chart from Fox News. A 4.6% increase looks astronomical but is miniscule compared to historical levels -chaddyr23 This is why I love you guys. Perspective FTW.

motherjones:

ilovecharts:

Super misleading chart from Fox News. A 4.6% increase looks astronomical but is miniscule compared to historical levels

-chaddyr23

This is why I love you guys.

Perspective FTW.

10 months ago · 721 notes
  1. flairey reblogged this from ilovecharts
  2. asynonymforgreatness reblogged this from ilovecharts
  3. twirlingavengers reblogged this from reallyfoxnews
  4. superterrifichappyfuntime reblogged this from itselzoido
  5. princess-opal reblogged this from tragicka and added:
    Wow, this is basic graph no-no 101.
  6. itselzoido reblogged this from pearly-sweetcake
  7. cwgraham reblogged this from ilovecharts
  8. pearly-sweetcake reblogged this from the-cumming-insurrection
  9. librophilia reblogged this from porcelain-horse-horselain and added:
    AHAHAHAHA THE ‘Y’-AXIS GOES BY TWOS. TWOS!
  10. porcelain-horse-horselain reblogged this from reallyfoxnews
  11. whinesandspirits reblogged this from pattilahell
  12. trulybadtiming reblogged this from dionthesocialist
  13. neyolithic reblogged this from mikkelsassbutt and added:
    I hate when Fox “fox” me over.
  14. ravenclaws-wit reblogged this from hukaria and added:
    This is the most misleading way to make a graph. Also, it won’t affect like 90% of voters.
  15. hooraybooze reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    I swear…
  16. hukaria reblogged this from ilovecharts
  17. thetruthsiren reblogged this from reallyfoxnews and added:
    FOX News always does this, their graphs don’t start from 0 as they should, and so it ends up being deceptive and...
  18. therealsabolish reblogged this from ilovecharts
  19. willyoufuckmebackhome reblogged this from reallyfoxnews
  20. randommanrunning reblogged this from ilovecharts
  21. sleepydragon26 reblogged this from motherjones
  22. sameoldantics reblogged this from reallyfoxnews and added:
    BLOW ME FOX
  23. anotherdeadredshirt reblogged this from cheeruppirate
  24. starsallhavenames reblogged this from motherjones and added:
    Well I mean yes if you conveniently start your chart at 34 and then increase the intervals by 2 and only cover 34-42,...
  25. nitrolace reblogged this from ilovecharts
  26. morelikegazoinksbo reblogged this from cheatsheet and added:
    are fucking kidding me? this is ridiculous.
  27. craigmac1989 reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    A little better
  28. greenvolcano reblogged this from ilovecharts
  29. whatqsees reblogged this from cottoncandymajinbuu
  30. cottoncandymajinbuu reblogged this from obama2016